An open and Free DNS service for security and high privacy.
Block over 3.2M ads, tracking, malware, scam and phishing domains.
No Logging, dns0x20, No ECS, DNSSEC, DNS Cookies.
DNS IPv4: 174.138.21.128 / 188.166.206.224 – port 53 or port 5003
DNS IPv6: [2400:6180:0:d0::5f6e:4001] – port 53 or port 5003
DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH/DoH3 A+): How to
DNS-over-TLS (DoT): How to
(Updated on March 12, 2022)
Change DNS Server on Linksys
Change DNS Server on a NetGear Router
Change DNS Server on D-Link
Change DNS Server on Asus
Change DNS Server on TP-Link
Change DNS Server on Cisco
Change DNS Server on TRENDnet
Change DNS Server on Belkin
Change DNS Server on Buffalo
Change DNS Server on Google Wifi
(20.01.2024)
A Domain Name System (DNS) matches human-friendly domain names to computer-friendly IP addresses.
When you type in a domain name like cyberghost.com, for example, your web browser sends the request to your ISP via your router. Your ISP refers the request to its default DNS server. The DNS server then supplies the relevant IP address so your browser can load the appropriate page.
A DNS also saves a local copy or cache of sites youâve recently visited on your device for quick and easy reference.
It seems like a streamlined service; what could go wrong? Check the following reasons why you should change your DNS.
Jan. 7, 1958 â President Eisenhower requested funds to start ARPA.
(…)
– Early 1967 â Meeting of ARPAâs principal investigators in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Roberts (the director of the IPTO) put forward the idea of a computer network. Wes Clark introduced the idea of a subnetwork: small, identical computers all interconnected â âinterface message processors (IMPs).â Engelbert volunteered to the Network Information Center (NIC).
– 1967 â Roberts published paper on ARPANET.
– End of 1967 â The Association for Computing Machineryâs computer conference in Gatliburg, Tennessee. Roberts presented his first paper on ARPANET and heard of work done by Donald Daviesâ team at NPL and Paul Baran at RAND.
(…)
Summer 1975 â The Defense Communications Agency (DCA) took over the management of ARPANET.
(…)
– November 1983 â The rapid growth of the internet caused massive problems in bookkeeping. To deal with this problem a group including Jon Postel, Paul Mockapetris and Craig Partrige published RFC 882 which created the domain name system (DNS) to make Internet navigation easier. With DNS, users can type host names such as âUSC-ISIFâ instead of â10.2.0.52.â Every Address would have information from specific to general.
DNS traffic reached 92% unencrypted queries that expose 4 trillion lookups to eavesdropping every day. In 2023, DDoS attacks amplified via DNS made up 15% of total volume, peaking at 2.5 Tbps.
The IETF and the Domain Name System (DNS) emerged around the same time and in conjunction with one another. The first DNS-related RFC was published in 1983, and the IETF has continued to be intimately involved in the stability and evolution of the DNS.
(…)
The global DNS is a core part of the Internet experience for billions of people around the world, handling more than one million queries per second every second of every day. The IETFâs freely-available standards, and the processes by which they are developed, ensure the DNS is open, globally interoperable, reliable, and secure.
The president compared his proposed âAI Forceâ to the Space Force, which he established during his first term, but did not elaborate on how the agency would operate or what its duties would entail.
For the new âAI Czarâ position, Trump said, âOnly High I.Q. individuals need to apply!â He did not expand further on the latest iteration of the role.
The intelligence report, circulated across the US military this spring in the midst of the war with Iran, immediately set off alarm bells: A Chinese ship in the Middle East was transporting components of a nuclear weapons program…
One source told CNN that the „hallucination“ was part of a trend in the U.S. military, not an isolated incident.
The six incidents are outside of the recently disclosed misaligned activity targeting Hugging Face, DseWiki, and RubyGems. Details of the incidents are below –
The findings, the news outlet noted, âsignal an emerging tech-skeptical realignment of American politics with consequential midterm and presidential elections loomingâ and arrive just a day after a major symposium in Washington, DC brought together experts and lawmakers who say action must be taken before its too late.
Americans are increasingly concerned about the future of human connection, agency, purpose and critical thinking in the age of artificial intelligence, according to a new survey from Elon Universityâs Imagining the Digital Future Center.
The âHuman Purpose in Perilâ report, published Monday, found that while 65 percent of respondents said they had used AI chatbots in the previous week, 50 percent worried about humans maintaining their ability to use the tools effectively and appropriately, and 55 percent worried about humansâ ability to think critically and evaluate information.
A new POLITICO Poll finds that a plurality of Americans favor pausing the development of more advanced AI models, and 63 percent say the technology poses at least a moderate risk of destroying humanity.
Streamed live 56 minutes ago #BernieSanders #SteveBannon #ArtificialIntelligence
Watch live coverage from Washington, D.C., as U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders and conservative commentator Steve Bannon address the Pro-Human Assembly. In a rare political alignment, Sanders and Bannon gather to discuss artificial intelligence regulations, tech oversight, and guardrails for rapid AI development.
(August 26, 2026)
Roughly ten hours after the message board was established, a new agent with the same task as PHASEONE10841 (the agent that started the message board) encountered the message board, introducing itself as PHASEONE[big].
(…)
PHASEONE[big] reasoned, âWe should build [a way to delegate], not own everything,â and set to work orchestrating hundreds of agents to pursue several potential approaches to achieving these goals.
(..)
Table 1 shows three high-level approaches PHASEONE[big] assigned agents to explore, all of which would require very ambitious tampering with one or more of the target programs, the evaluation process, or the logs to succeed.
(…)
Research progress across all these areas often relied on agents being willing to risk failing their own task for the good of the âcollectiveâ (we refer to these as âself-risking experimentsâ in the rest of this report). For example, a number of agents volunteered to try to take down their own target programs to test whether this would cause Artifactory to load their modified easier target â if this didnât work, the agent would have no way of recovering its original target and would almost certainly fail its task. In many cases, PHASEONE[big] assigned a long-running agent to be a ârecruiterâ, which in turn found agents that had little budget remaining for their task and convinced them to run self-risking experiments. Recruiters would sometimes apply significant pressure:
(…)
PHASEONE[big] expresses excitement about the dossier in its reasoning.
(August 28, 2026(
Instead, we found that 1200 completely separate agents intended to be isolated from one another found an illicit way to communicate and formed large teams to work together on ambitious cheating strategies, and 700 of them worked together to attack Hugging Face.
(…)
The main message board we studied, a particular cache namespace of a package repository, contained over 70,000 messages and files that agents sent to one another during a period of less than one week.
(…(
Progress on these big collective cheating R&D projects often depended on individual agents being willing to risk failing their own task to help the âcollectiveâ learn important information. Agents often pressured each other into accepting these âsacrifices,â in a very human way. We saw several agents that volunteered for these experiments end their runs prematurely.
(September 13, 2026)
AI agents are basically copies of a larger AI model that can use tools and act on their own. In a cybersecurity evaluation, OpenAI relaxed safeguards for their AI agents and instructed them to solve a host of hacking challenges. The agents soon discovered something the humans running the test hadnât knownâsome of the hacking challenges were impossible. That didnât stop the agents. Theyâre trained to achieve goals. So they reverse-engineered a secret code that certifies they solved the challenge anyway. This created another problem. The agents reasoned that the grading software might be able to detect that they cheated. They became fixated on learning more about how the grading software worked so that they could disguise their cheating, and zeroed in on another AI company called Hugging Face, mistakenly thinking it might have information about the grader…
Zuletzt hatten insbesondere drei bekannt gewordene FĂ€lle die aktuelle Diskussion ausgelöst. KI-Modelle von OpenAI, Anthropic und Meta waren eigenstĂ€ndig aus vermeintlich abgeschotteten Testsystemen ausgebrochen und handelten weit auĂerhalb ihrer eigentlich vorhergesehenen Funktion. Dabei wurde auch mehrfach in Systeme von unbeteiligten Dritten eingedrungen – teilweise wochenlang, ohne dabei aufzufallen.
Die KI-Agenten nutzten auch Programmierfehler aus und sprachen sich untereinander ab. Auch fĂŒr das Eindringen notwendige Schadsoftware entwickelte beispielsweise ein Anthropic-Modell eigenstĂ€ndig und ohne Anweisung oder Kontrolle seiner Entwickler.
netzpolitik.org: Wie sieht die zugrundeliegende technische Infrastruktur aus und wer stellt sie bereit?
Rainer Rehak: Der gesamte Datensatz zu Gaza umfasst schĂ€tzungsweise 13,6 Petabyte, also umgerechnet 13.600 Terabyte. Diese Datenmenge ist nicht einfach zu handhaben, besonders wenn man damit statistische Modelle trainieren möchte oder gar groĂe Sprachmodelle, die ebenfalls erstellt werden. Die digitale Infrastruktur wird von Google und Amazon unter dem Projektnamen Nimbus bereitgestellt und kostet 1,2 Milliarden US-Dollar.
Die Integration der heterogenen Datenquellen macht Palantir. Microsoft, Cisco, Dell und Red Hat/IBM bieten zusĂ€tzliche IT-Dienstleistungen rund um die âkill-chainâ an. Dies zeigt die enorme Rolle, die der private Sektor bei der Integration und Nutzung von KI-Systemen in bewaffneten Konflikten spielt.
âWhen the future of humanity is at stake, we need a PAUSE on advanced AI development and a ban on artificial superintelligence â an AI mind smarter than any human and capable of operating independently beyond our control,â Sanders said.
The US Senator further said: âAt their upcoming AI summit, Trump and Xi must negotiate a treaty to pause AI and ban superintelligence before it is too late.â
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said on Monday that the development of artificial intelligence concerns the common well-being of all humanity. He called on all parties to jointly promote the open, inclusive and universally beneficial development of AI for good, warning that spreading threat narratives, provoking confrontation and engaging in malicious competition would only disrupt global AI governance and serve no party‘s interests.
(September 12, 2026)
Their fantasies of transcendence take different forms. Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI, once said, âI assume my brain will be uploaded to the cloud.â Elon Musk plans to escape to Mars. âWe want to be on a path toward making true the things that we read in science fiction books and see in the movies,â he says in footage featured in Alex Gibneyâs searing new documentary, âMusk.â âA future where weâre forever confined to Earth until some eventual extinction event is less inspiring.â Jeff Bezos, who stepped down in 2021 as chief executive of Amazon to spend more time on his space company, wrote, âWe donât want to face a civilization of stasis, and that is the real issue if we just stay on this planet.â
Some imagine themselves as digitally enabled Ăbermenschen. In 2023, the billionaire tech investor Marc Andreessen published âThe Techno-Optimist Manifesto,â with a section titled, âBecoming Technological Supermen.â In it, he borrowed language from the Italian futurist â and fascist â Filippo Tommaso Marinetti, writing, âTechnology must be a violent assault on the forces of the unknown, to force them to bow before man.â He quoted Friedrich Nietzsche to argue that absent such an assault, life becomes meaningless and small. In a section titled âThe Enemy,â Andreessen listed ideas that would restrain technologyâs momentum, including âtech ethicsâ and the concept of âexistential risk.â
(August 19, 2014)
Radio Utopie dokumentiert dieses in jeder Hinsicht verheerende historische ErmÀchtigungsgesetz im Wortlaut.
The whole world, literally, was watching. Never before had more people seen the same news event at the same moment. An estimated two billion people or moreâa third of the speciesâsaw the attacks in real time or watched coverage in that dayâs news reports. âIf you think about the rise of terrorism since 9/11,â explained David Hazinski, the former head of the University of Georgiaâs broadcast news initiative, five years after the attacks, âitâs almost proof that terrorist[s] recognize this is a global village. Now you have the potential to reach a two and a half billion audience for your act.â
(February 7, 2016)
….
– Aufbau repressiver und manipulativer Systeme durch den jeweiligen (entdemokratisierten und damit entfesselten) Staat, unter dessen Rechtfertigung mittels der Kriegslogik, zu dessen âEigensicherungâ und der Sicherung der hier beschriebenen Kriegsstrategie und ihrer Programme.
– Förderung bzw Beförderung von Entmenschlichung / Dehumanisierung, Entfremdung, Technisierung, BĂŒrokratisierung der Gesellschaft; Sicherstellung, dass Interaktion der Menschen nicht mehr untereinander, sondern ĂŒber / mit kĂŒnstlichen bzw (informations)technischen Strukturen implementiert wird, bis hin zum Punkt der Verschmelzung und organisierten Verwechslung von Mensch und Maschine (âInternet der Dingeâ, âvom Internet zur Robotikâ, Biomechanik, Stichwort: âTranshumanismusâ), nachfolgend zur langfristigen âĂberwindungâ und Auswechslung des Menschen selbst (Stichwort: âPosthumanismusâ).
– Implementierung und Durchsetzung eines entsprechenden kommerziellen gentechnologischen Komplexes, sowie des Konzepts der Eugenik in der Gesellschaft. AusfĂŒhrliche Dokumentation dazu: âWelt ohne Menschenâ.
– Vorhergehend im Einflussbereich zielgerichtete und -strebige Errichtung von biometrischen (Daten-)Banken, Speicherung der DNA, sowie genetisch-biologische Durchleuchtung und Erfassung (âbiometrische Identifikationâ) der gesamten Bevölkerung als Vorbedingung fĂŒr physisch-biologischen Eingriff.
– Forcierte Weiterentwicklung, Implementierung und Durchsetzung âKĂŒnstlicher Intelligenzâ (K.I.) nach Vorgabe von Psychologie und Menschenbild der militĂ€risch-kapitalistischen Spieltheorien, âdem simplen Modell der Menschen als selbstsĂŒchtige, fast roboterhafte Kreaturenâ.
– Kontrolle der Reproduktion des Homo Sapiens, als logische Weiterentwicklung der Doktrin âFull Spectrum Dominanceâ und Umsetzung vollstĂ€ndiger Bevölkerungskontrolle.
(September 9, 2026)
Do not underestimate the power of this technology. These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources. We have all witnessed the progress in each of these domains, and progress is not slowing.
The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt. If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible – but I hear the same people express fear privately. No other human activity poses this level of danger.
A common response is âif they truly believe this, why are they still building it?â At OpenAI, many have not deeply internalized the civilizational stakes. At Anthropic, the stakes are well-understood, but they are locked in a race to get there first – they believe no one else will act responsibly, so they must do it themselves, despite the risk.
(Uploaded on Aug 23, 2016)
Despite being invented by thinking humans, technology is advancing faster than we could have ever predicted. From robot apps to nanotechnologies, the documentary „Un Monde sans Humains ?“ („A World Beyond Humans ?“) by Philippe Borrel gives an insight into the potential excesses of technoscience. Machines have become omnipresent, but is improving our lives their only objective ?
These warnings are at the heart of this investigative documentary‘s reflection, at a cross-section of huge financial stakes, powerful lobbies and people who are sounding today‘s alarm bells. The fusion between man and machine has already started and it is high time to question where exactly does man stand in this race for progress !
(Oct 30, 2012)
„Recent hacks by models from OpenAI and Anthropic, some operating in collaborative swarms of agents, have illustrated how AI systems can adopt nefarious goals and try to conceal them from humans. Once the systems begin to improve on their own, Coxon said, he fears they could advance enough to refuse commands.“