(29 Jun 2021)
· Leaders in Australia, the UK, Indonesia, Ukraine, Bangladesh, Singapore and other public and private sector members have come together to collaborate and share best practices to reduce the spread of child sexual exploitation and abuse online, violent extremist and terrorist content, and health misinformation
(October 20, 2014)
One day, as I surfed the web on my laptop and lamented how long it takes a YouTube video to load, I found myself wondering if employees of the US government — DoD researchers, DoE scientists, CIA spies — are also beholden to the same congestion and shoddy peering that affects everyone else on the internet. Surely, as hundreds of scientists at Fermi Lab near Chicago wait for petabytes of raw data to arrive from the Large Hadron Collider in Europe, they don‘t suffer interminable connection drops and inexplicable lag. And, as it turns out, they don‘t: the US government and its national laboratories all have exclusive access to ESnet — a shadow internet that can sustain 100-gigabits-per-second transfers between any of the major Department of Energy labs. And today, the DoE announced that the 100-gigabit ESnet will be extended across the Atlantic to our Old World comrades, who occasionally manage to dazzle us with their scientific endeavors.
(25.04.2023)
â child porn
â animal porn
â spy shit
â illegally and arbitrarily stolen communications, secrets, private information and other intellectual, creative, spiritual and personal property (formely called thoughts, identity, mind and soul, and stuff)
â deceitful law drafts, that potentially could be talked into parliamentarian dummies, in order to sell those laws on the other hand to a bunch of idiots as some kind of aid, protection or rescue for anybody, so that everybodyÂŽs applauding when they are subjected to an electronic colony, police state and feudalism.
And remember: if they are progessives, they let you do it!
(Mar 27, 2021)
In the short term, Europe may be able to shrug off the illegality of its data-sharing practices under the GDPR, and please privacy advocates with adequacy reviews, but in the long term the violation of Europeâs own data privacy crownpiece is sure to harm its international credibility.
(April 8, 2021)
To much of the rest of the world, however, this competition is little more than evil versus evil. The U.S. government has also practiced mass surveillance; big U.S. technology companies have adopted a surveillance-based business model, exploiting peopleâs data in the name of free service; and the Five Eyes, an intelligence coalition comprised of the United States and Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom, has sought to undermine encryption by pressuring companies to give governments backdoor access to all digital communications. In this dismal global race to the digital bottom, the biggest losers are ordinary technology users all over the world.
(08 February 2022)
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
The agreement came after the European Union, which participates in the G7, inched closer this month to passing legislation to regulate AI technology, potentially the world‘s first comprehensive AI law that could form a precedent among the advanced economies.
„We want AI systems to be accurate, reliable, safe and non-discriminatory, regardless of their origin,“ European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on Friday.
Anbieter können in ihrem Bericht an die DEA nach eigenem Ermessen entscheiden, welche Informationen sie weitergeben. Gleichzeitig enthÀlt der Gesetzentwurf aber auch eine Liste mit Informationen, die einem solchen Bericht beiliegen sollten. Dazu gehören etwa Mail- und IP-Adressen, Zahlungsinformationen, der geographische Standort sowie ein kompletter Auszug der betreffenden Inhalte. Diese Informationen kann die DEA dann auch an andere Strafverfolgungsbehörden weiterleiten.
Die Daten sollen nicht nur weitergegeben, sondern auch vom Provider an einem âsicheren Ortâ fĂŒr 90 Tage nach Einreichung bei der DEA gespeichert werden. Im Gesetzentwurf ist jedoch auch vermerkt, dass die DEA eine VerlĂ€ngerung der Speicherung beantragen kann, wenn sie beabsichtigt, gegen Nutzer*innen zu ermitteln oder die Daten an andere Behörden weiterzuleiten.
Nutzer*innen wissen derweil nichts von der Weiterleitung ihrer Daten.
In many ways, this is similar to the CyberTipline for CSAM that requires websites to report details if they come across child sexual abuse material. But, CSAM is strict liability content for which there is no 1st Amendment protection. Demanding that anything even remotely referencing an illegal drug transaction be sent to the DEA will sweep up a ton of perfectly protected speech.
Worse, it will lead to massive overreporting of useless leads. Iâve mentioned just recently that we get a ton of attempted spam comments here at Techdirt, over a million in just the last six months alone. A decent percentage of these appear to be pushing what are likely to be illegal drugs. Now, we catch the vast majority of these in the spam filter, and they never reach the site. And, I donât think a mere spam comment alone would reach the level of knowledge necessary to trigger this law, but the point is that thereâs potential that our lawyers would warn us that to protect ourselves from potentially ruinous liability for failing to report these spam messages to the DEA, theyâd recommend we basically flood the DEA with a bunch of the spam messages we received just to avoid the risk of liability.
Additionally, the FBI and Interpol both recently spoke out against encrypted chat apps and lawmakers in the U.K. and European Union are considering laws like the EARN IT Act that could also decrease the availability of encryption.
All these developments could open the next front in the war over encryption that has flared up over the past decade, often pitting law enforcement against civil liberties groups in the U.S. and abroad.
Hinzu kommt laut der BĂŒrgerrechtsorganisation auch ein neuer zivilrechtlicher Anspruch, der Privatklagen gegen Internetunternehmen und App-Stores wegen der âFörderung oder Erleichterungâ der Ausbeutung von Kindern, des âHostings oder Speicherns von Kinderpornografieâ oder des âZugĂ€nglichmachens von Kinderpornografie fĂŒr jedermannâ ermöglichen soll. Dies geschehe alles auf der Grundlage eines sehr niedrigen FahrlĂ€ssigkeitsstandards, so die EFF.
AuĂerdem wird ein Benachrichtigungs- und Löschsystem geschaffen, das von einem neu geschaffenen Ausschuss fĂŒr den Schutz von Kindern im Internet beaufsichtigt wird und von den Anbietern verlangt, Inhalte auf Anfrage zu entfernen oder zu deaktivieren, noch bevor eine administrative oder gerichtliche Entscheidung vorliegt, dass es sich bei den Inhalten tatsĂ€chlich um CSAM handelt.
Damit geht das geplante Gesetz lange nicht so weit wie die europĂ€ische Chatkontrolle oder der britische Online Safety Act, welche derzeit von den Anbietern verlangen, die Kommunikationsinhalte und gespeicherte Dateien vor der VerschlĂŒsselung zu durchsuchen. Dennoch sieht die EFF in den Formulierungen des Gesetzes groĂe Fallstricke:
(18.04.2023)
Itâs âprotect the childrenâ season in Congress with the return of KOSA and EARN IT, two terrible bills that attack the internet, and rely on peopleâs ignorance of how things actually work to pretend theyâre making the internet safer, when theyâre not. Added to this is Senator Dick Durbinâs STOP CSAM Act, which heâs been touting since February, but only now has officially put out a press release announcing the bill (though, he hasnât released the actual language of the bill, because that would actually be helpful to people analyzing it). (…)
Notice whatâs not talked about? Itâs not mentioned how much law enforcement has done to actually track down, arrest, and prosecute the perpetrators. Thatâs the stat that matters. But itâs missing.
(21.04.2023)
– It makes it a crime for providers to âknowingly host or storeâ CSAM or âknowingly promote or facilitateâ the sexual exploitation of children, including the creation of CSAM, on their platforms.
– It creates a new civil claim and corresponding Section 230 carveout to encourage private lawsuits against internet companies and app stores for the âpromotion or facilitationâ of child exploitation, the âhosting or storing of child pornography,â or for âmaking child pornography available to any personââall based on the very low standard of negligence.
– It requires providers to remove (in addition to reporting and preserving) âapparentâ CSAM when they obtain actual knowledge of the content on their platforms.
– It creates a notice-and-takedown system overseen by a newly created Child Online Protection Board, requiring providers to remove or disable content upon request even before an administrative or judicial determination that the content is in fact CSAM.
(…)
Because the law already prohibits the distribution of CSAM, the billâs broad terms could be interpreted as reaching more passive conduct like merely providing an encrypted app.
(…)
Not every platform will have the resources to fight these threats in court, especially newcomers that compete with entrenched giants like Meta and Google.
(19.04.2023)
WASHINGTON â U.S. Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, today introduced the Strengthening Transparency and Obligation to Protect Children Suffering from Abuse and Mistreatment Act of 2023 (STOP CSAM Act), legislation to crack down on the proliferation of child sex abuse material online. To combat this horrific crime, the STOP CSAM Act supports victims and increases accountability and transparency for online platforms.