(June 8, 2026)
A deepfake is AI-generated or AI-manipulated media that convincingly replaces one personâs face, voice, or both, or fabricates someoneâs likeness entirely. Unlike older editing techniques, deepfakes are generated by generative adversarial networks (GANs) or diffusion models, making them increasingly difficult to detect with the naked eye.
(September 21, 2026)
Houthi leader Abdul Malik al-Houthi has delivered a televised address from Sanaa marking the anniversary of the 21st September revolution, describing the group‘s takeover as a liberation from foreign hegemony.
The speech is followed by analysis from security analyst…….
(March 17, 2025)
Houthis Vs US | US Houthis Attack | Houthis Attack On US | Houthi Chief Abdul-Malik Video | Houthi Chief Video | Houthi Chief Video Message | Missile Attack on US | Houthis US News | Houthis News | US News
(June 12, 2026)
On November 30, 2023, the âNew York Timesâ reported, that the Netanyahu government knew of Hamasâ attack plan a year before. The relevant document was âcirculated widely among Israeli military and intelligence leadersâ. Did you ask around in your country what your state or commercial spy agencies knew of this?
The state of Israel is in bed with every âwesternâ spy agency (look it up). So, either all of your state spies, at least in the âWestern Worldâ, but also in the vast majority of Arab monarchies, knew of this, are collaborators in this very normal massacre of October 7th and need to be abolished, or they did not know, therefore are worthless and need to be abolished. All it takes is a simple question. A win-win question to get a grip on the spies, one of the most important part of the global war machine. Did you ask that question? Did anybody?
(…)
Russian President Vladimir Putin just held a high-stakes bilateral meeting with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on the sidelines of the SCO Summit in Bishkek. The optics and message were unmistakable.
(October 15, 2024)
Over the past year, Israel has launched attacks on multiple countries and occupied territories: the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen and Iran.
Yet countries and territories aside, Israel has also targeted one specific organization with a series of unprecedented rhetorical and violent attacks.
Yes, the United Nations. We have all witnessed Israel, in effect, declare war on the UN.
(October 25, 2015)
A political consultant once related how he lunched with Benjamin Netanyahu, who ordered a hamburger with fries. He was not supposed to be eating such foods â doctorâs orders. As they were finishing up, Bibiâs wife, Sarah, came in, saw the evidence and began to see red. Netanyahu, all righteous indignation, looked her straight in the eye and said he had eaten no such hamburger. The storyteller said he was convinced at that moment that Netanyahu himself believed it.
If apocryphal, it is definitely in character. Netanyahu regularly embraces bad ideas or even lies so totally that he convinces himself of their rightness. Others start to believe them too. His outlandish idea, uttered in a speech, was that Hitler would have been happy with just expelling Jews if a Palestinian, the then grand mufti of Jerusalem, had not suggested annihilation instead.
(August 2, 2026)
In Sanaâa, Yemenâs capital, pictures of Abdul-Malik al-Houthi are a frequent sight. He glowers from billboards, with a dagger tucked in his belt. Crowds watch his speeches on big screens. His followers wave banners showing his face. Mr Houthi is everywhereâand nowhere. The rebel leader, who has controlled most of north-west Yemen for more than a decade, never appears in public. He holds meetings by video from caves and safe-houses.
Jede KriegfĂŒhrung grĂŒndet auf TĂ€uschung. Wenn wir also fĂ€hig sind anzugreifen, mĂŒssen wir unfĂ€hig erscheinen; wenn wir unsere StreitkrĂ€fte einsetzen, mĂŒssen wir inaktiv scheinen; wenn wir nahe sind, mĂŒssen wir den Feind glauben machen, daĂ wir weit entfernt sind; wenn wir weit entfernt sind, mĂŒssen wir ihn glauben machen, daĂ wir nahe sind.
Lege Köder aus, um den Feind zu verfĂŒhren. TĂ€usche Unordnung vor und zerschmettere ihn. Wenn der Feind in allen Punkten sicher ist, dann sei auf ihn vorbereitet. Wenn er an KrĂ€ften ĂŒberlegen ist, dann weiche ihm aus. Wenn dein Gegner ein cholerisches Temperament hat, dann versuche ihn zu reizen.
Gib vor, schwach zu sein, damit er ĂŒberheblich wird. Wenn er sich sammeln will, dann lasse ihm keine Ruhe. Wenn seine StreitkrĂ€fte vereint sind, dann zersplittere sie. Greife ihn an, wo er unvorbereitet ist, tauche auf, wo du nicht erwartet wirst.
Der General, der eine Schlacht gewinnt, stellt vor dem Kampf im Geiste viele Berechnungen an. Der General, der verliert, stellt vorher kaum Berechnungen an. So fĂŒhren viele Berechnungen zum Sieg und wenig Berechnungen zur Niederlage â ĂŒberhaupt keine erst recht! Indem ich diesem Punkt Aufmerksamkeit widme, kann ich voraussagen, wer siegen
oder unterliegen wird.
18. All warfare is based on deception.
19. Hence, when able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.
20. Hold out baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him.
21. If he is secure at all points, be prepared for him. If he is in superior strength, evade him.
22. If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant.
23. If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them.
24. Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected.
25. These military devices, leading to victory, must not be divulged beforehand.
26. Now the general who wins a battle makes many calculations in his temple ere the battle is fought. The general who loses a battle makes but few calculations beforehand. Thus do many calculations lead to victory, and few calculations to defeat: how much more no calculation at all! It is by attention to this point that I can foresee who is likely to win or lose.
(August 7, 2021)
Because they want to.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu‘s request to delay testifying in his criminal trial was accepted by judges on Sunday due to „security and political“ reasons related to „the dramatic events that have occurred in the State of Israel and throughout the Middle East in recent times,“ according to a letter sent to judges.
(August 7, 2021)
Weil sie es wollen.
(August 7, 2021)
Because they want to.
The last speech of prime minister and minister of defense Yitzhak Rabin, who was assassinated by right-wing Israeli radical on November 4th 1995 in Tel Aviv.
(today)
The US and 40 partner countries gathered in Prague last week for a symposium to advance the implementation of reimposed United Nations Security Council resolutions (UNSCRs) against Iran, the US State Department confirmed on Tuesday. (…)
Six UNSCRs were reimposed on September 27, 2025, after the Islamic Republic regime‘s „continuing ‚significant non-performance‘ of its nuclear commitments,“ the State Department noted.
(August 28, 2025)
The JCPOA was concluded in July 2015 between Iran and permanent Council members China, France, Russia, the UK, and the US, as well as Germany (collectively known as the P5+1), and unanimously endorsed by the Council through resolution 2231. The agreement placed significant restrictions on Iranâs nuclear programme in exchange for relief from UN sanctions, which the Council had imposed between 2006 and 2010. The restrictions were scheduled to progressively expire over time, culminating in the âtermination dayâ of 18 October 2025, when the Council would end its consideration of the Iranian nuclear file.
The agreement also contained a provisionâknown as the âsnapbackâ mechanismâallowing any JCPOA participant to reimpose UN sanctions in the event of âsignificant non-performanceâ by Iran. The snapback operates through a two-stage process anchored in both the JCPOA (articles 36â37) and resolution 2231 (operative paragraphs 11â13). If a participant considers another to be in âsignificant non-performanceâ, it may refer the matter to the JCPOAâs Joint Commissionâwhich is coordinated by the European Union (EU)âand its Dispute Resolution Mechanism (DRM).
(May 14, 2018)
D.h., das Atomabkommen gilt faktisch nur fĂŒr die Vertragsparteien ohne Vetomacht im U.N.-Sicherheitsrat: den Iran, Deutschland und die EuropĂ€ische Union.
Es ist anzunehmen, dass sich jetzt wieder einmal alle beteiligen Regierungen auf die UnfÀhigkeit herausreden ihren eigenen Betrug zu verstehen.
Eine U.N.-Resolution ist Teil des am 14. Juli 2015 unterschriebenen internationalen Iranabkommen / Atomabkommen (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, J.C.P.O.A.).
Bereits Monate vorher warnte Radio Utopie ausdrĂŒcklich vor genau dieser kommenden U.N.-Resolution und der damit zusammenhĂ€ngenden Frage der Sanktionen. (4. April 2015, Das Iran-Abkommen: Wende oder Hebel)
Und schon zuvor warnten wir im MĂ€rz 2015 davor, dass diese kommende U.N.-Resolution sich ausgerechnet auf Kapitel VII der nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg beschlossenen Charta der Vereinten Nationen berufen solle
Genau das tut die am am 20. Juli 2015 im U.N.-Sicherheitsrat beschlossene Resolution 2231 (2015), indem sie sich in ihren entscheidenen Abschnitten (âdecidesâ) auf Artikel 41 (und damit Kapitel VII) der Charta der Vereinten Nationen beruft.
(April 4, 2015)
Am 23. MĂ€rz meldete der britische âTelegraphâ, dass sich in der iranischen Zeitung Kayhan Abgeordnete des iranischen Majlis ĂŒber die Verhandlungsstrategie von AuĂenminister Zarif beschwerten und bezĂŒglich einer von Zarif angestrebten Resolution nach Kapitel VII der U.N.-Charta als einer âFalleâ sprachen. Auch der eine oder andere Generalissimus, wie ĂŒberall ReprĂ€sentant der örtlichen Hochkultur, befand â gerade noch rechtzeitig â es sei vielleicht doch keine so gute Idee sich mit der Zustimmung zu einer Kapitel VII-Resolution auch noch selbst als GefĂ€hrdung des Weltfriedens zu bezeichnen, nur weil man Atomkraftwerke und medizinische Anlagen samt Forschung dazu betreibt.
Im nun vorgestern am 2. April in Lausanne von den Regierungen der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika, des Vereinigten Königreichs, der Russischen Föderation, von China, Frankreich und Deutschland gemeinsam mit Iran beschlossenen und veröffentlichten Abkommen ist von einer âneuen Resolution des Sicherheitsratesâ die Rede, die das Abkommen bzw dessen âJoint Comprehensive Plan of Actionâ (JCPOA) âunterstĂŒtzenâ und auf dessen vollstĂ€ndige Umsetzung âdrĂ€ngenâ soll.
Frage: Nach Kapitel VII U.N.-Charta? Bei âernsthaften Konsequenzenâ fĂŒr den Iran, wegen erklĂ€rter GefĂ€hrdung von âinternationalen Frieden und Sicherheit,â wegen behaupteter oder tatsĂ€chlicher Vertragsverletzungen?
(September 12, 2025)
As Iâve discussed at length recently, we have already witnessed the death of the global trading system as we have known it. But this slide away from the rules-based system isnât limited to trade. It is evident in the use of military force as well.
Three examples of unilateral military action over the past couple weeks are particularly instructive:
(…)
That is the real Hobbesian peril. Each of these actions can be seen as an isolated instance, but if one or two or three countries take kinetic action unilaterally, it risks creating a permission structure where others feel there are no guardrails to constrain them.
(September 12, 2025)
As Iâve discussed at length recently, we have already witnessed the death of the global trading system as we have known it. But this slide away from the rules-based system isnât limited to trade. It is evident in the use of military force as well.
Three examples of unilateral military action over the past couple weeks are particularly instructive:
(…)
That is the real Hobbesian peril. Each of these actions can be seen as an isolated instance, but if one or two or three countries take kinetic action unilaterally, it risks creating a permission structure where others feel there are no guardrails to constrain them.
(archive entries)
The last speech of prime minister and minister of defense Yitzhak Rabin, who was assassinated by right-wing Israeli radical on November 4th 1995 in Tel Aviv.
Similar views have been echoed by ministers within Netanyahu‘s government.
Last year, in a documentary, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich was filmed advocating for the expansion of Israeli borders to include Damascus.
He suggested that Israel would gradually grow to encompass not only all Palestinian territories but also parts of Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, Syria, Iraq and Saudi Arabia.
(August 12, 2025)
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu tells i24 he feels he is on a âhistoric and spiritual mission,â and that he is âveryâ attached to the vision of a Greater Israel, which includes areas slated for a future Palestinian state and possibly also areas that are part of present-day Jordan and Egypt.
The interviewer Sharon Gal, who was briefly a right-wing member of Knesset, gifts to Netanyahu what he says is an amulet of âa map of the Promised Land.â