Alphabet Incâs (GOOGL.O) Google unit won approval from U.S. regulators to deploy a radar-based motion sensing device known as Project Soli.
Daily Archives: 2. Januar 2019
Trump freut sich auf Treffen mit Kim Jong-un
Kim Jong-un hatte in seiner Neujahrsansprache am Dienstag gesagt, dass er sich jederzeit mit dem US-PrĂ€sidenten zusammensetzen wĂŒrde.
PrÀsident Moon will permanenten Frieden in Korea etablieren
Der Frieden, den man jetzt erlebe, sei vorĂŒbergehend. Er wolle sein Bestes geben, damit aus der Strömung eine Welle des Friedens werde, die nicht rĂŒckgĂ€ngig gemacht werden könne.
Kim ist bereit, Trump jederzeit zu treffen, verlangt Aufhebung der Sanktionen gegen Nordkorea
Sagt, dass die Koreaner die FĂŒhrung bei Frieden und Wiedervereinigung ĂŒbernehmen mĂŒssen.
Merkel appears to take aim at Trump with vow to take on âmore responsibilityâ in world
Ms Merkel said Germany will push for âglobal solutionsâ as it takes up a two-year seat on the UN Security Council, and she noted that the country is spending more on defence and humanitarian aid.
Ms Merkel, who will step down as chancellor in 2021, pointed to curbing climate change, managing migration and combating terrorism as the kinds of challenges that benefit from international cooperation.
Was passiert nach dem angekĂŒndigten Abzug der US-Truppen aus #Syrien? @RKiesewetter plĂ€diert im Interview mit @DLFNachrichten fĂŒr die Errichtung einer Pufferzone unter @UN-Mandat. #Europa mĂŒsse im UN-Sicherheitsrat mit einer lauteren Stimme sprechen.
BND an US-gefĂŒhrter Operation gegen den IS beteiligt
(3.2.2018) Insgesamt sollen 22 LĂ€nder an der Operation beteiligt sein. Sie wird dem Bericht zufolge vom US-amerikanischen Joint Special Operations Command von einer MilitĂ€rbasis in Jordanien aus gesteuert. Aufgabe der Mission ist unter anderem die Auswertung von Dokumenten, DatentrĂ€gern, DNA-Spuren und FingerabdrĂŒcken, die SpezialkrĂ€fte in ehemaligen IS-Gebieten sichergestellt haben.
Der BND und die Bundeswehr wollten laut Spiegel schon lÀnger, dass sich Deutschland an diesem Informationsaustausch beteiligt.
Datentausch mit dem US-MilitÀr: BND lehnt ab, Europol springt ein
(18.4.2017) Laut einem Ratsdokument der EuropĂ€ischen Union will die EU-Polizeiagentur Europol in Den Haag FingerabdrĂŒcke und DNA-Spuren verarbeiten, die das US-MilitĂ€rs in Kriegsgebieten sammelt. Der Datentausch erfolgt im Rahmen der Operation „Gallant Phoenix“. Dabei handelt es sich um ein AufklĂ€rungsprojekt des US-MilitĂ€rs, das in Jordanien angesiedelt ist. Auch US-Geheimdienste nehmen daran teil. „Gallant Phoenix“ steht unter Leitung des Joint Special Operations Command, das die Spezialeinheiten aller TeilstreitkrĂ€fte befehligt.
The Pentagon Ups the Ante in Syria Fight
(30. MĂ€rz 2015) Also in Jordan is a U.S.-led multinational effort named Operation Gallant Phoenix, aimed at tracking the foreign fighter flow into Iraq and Syria. Begun as an initiative under Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), which controls the militaryâs most elite special operations units, and JSOCâs higher administrative headquarters, U.S. Special Operations Command, it has expanded to include participation by U.S. Central Command and U.S. European Command, said the senior special operations officer. Although sometimes referred to as the âforeign fighter task force,â Gallant Phoenix doesnât have troops of its own to send out on raids or direct assaults and instead passes on the information it receives to allied countries.
Americaâs Black-Ops Blackout: Unraveling the Secrets of the Militaryâs Secret Military
(7. Januar 2014) As Special Operations Command chief Admiral William McRaven put it in SOCOM 2020, his blueprint for the future, it has ambitious aspirations to create âa Global SOF network of like-minded interagency allies and partners.â In other words, in that future now only six years off, it wants to be everywhere.
(…)
While Congressional pushback has thus far thwarted Admiral McRavenâs efforts to create a SOCOM satellite headquarters for the more than 300 special operators working in Washington, D.C. (at the cost of $10 million annually), the command has nonetheless stationed support teams and liaisons all over the capital in a bid to embed itself ever more deeply inside the Beltway. âI have folks in every agency here in Washington, D.C. â from the CIA, to the FBI, to the National Security Agency, to the National Geospatial Agency, to the Defense Intelligence Agency,â McRaven said during a panel discussion at Washingtonâs Wilson Center in 2013. Referring to the acronyms of the many agencies with which SOCOM has forged ties, McRaven continued: âIf there are three letters, and in some cases four, I have a person there.“
Obama Gives Commanders Wide Berth for Secret Warfare
(25. Mai 2010) Gen. Stanley McChrystal, at the time the director of operations for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, advised President Obama to allow combatant commanders more latitude to combat terrorism using task forces. Coming from McChrystal, it was a surprising endorsement of a policy that would shift responsibility for unconventional warfare from JSOC, which he had commanded, to the combatant commanders.
U.S. Is Said to Expand Secret Actions in Mideast
(24. Mai 2010) The order, which an official said was drafted in close coordination with Adm. Eric T. Olson, the officer in charge of the United States Special Operations Command, calls for clandestine activities that âcannot or will not be accomplishedâ by conventional military operations or âinteragency activities,â a reference to American spy agencies.
While the C.I.A. and the Pentagon have often been at odds over expansion of clandestine military activity, most recently over intelligence gathering by Pentagon contractors in Pakistan and Afghanistan, there does not appear to have been a significant dispute over the September order.
A spokesman for the C.I.A. declined to confirm the existence of General Petraeusâs order, but said that the spy agency and the Pentagon had a âclose relationshipâ and generally coordinate operations in the field.
The Special Ops Command That‘s Displacing The CIA
(1. Dezember 2009) The military at large has also felt the growing influence of JSOC. Indeed, General Stanley McChrystal, now the top military commander in Afghanistan, led JSOC from 2003 to 2008. McChrystal‘s extensive special operations in Iraq, credited as crucial in the country‘s stabilization, earned both him and JSOC wide support in the military and in Washington. In his high-powered role in Afghanistan, McChrystal is increasingly turning to his old command. Spencer Ackerman reports that JSOC‘s current leadership is „playing a large and previously unreported role in shaping the Obama administration‘s Afghanistan and Pakistan strategy.“ That new influence includes strategic decision-making and direct involvement in the more traditional warfare conducted by the conventional military. Ackerman writes:
„In his Afghanistan review, McChrystal said that a key goal for him would be to increase coordination between his NATO command and the independent command of JSOC, which suggested that the dichotomy between using Special Operations Forces for counterterrorism and conventional forces for counterinsurgency was eroding.“
Defending the Arsenal: In an unstable Pakistan, can nuclear warheads be kept safe?
(16. November 2009) An American former senior intelligence official said that a team that has trained for years to remove or dismantle parts of the Pakistani arsenal has now been augmented by a unit of the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), the Ă©lite counterterrorism group. He added that the unit, which had earlier focussed on the warheadsâ cores, has begun to concentrate on evacuating the triggers, which have no radioactive material and are thus much easier to handle.
âThe Pakistanis gave us a virtual look at the number of warheads, some of their locations, and their command-and-control system,â the former senior intelligence official told me. âWe saw their target list and their mobilization plans. We got their security plans, so we could augment them in case of a breach of security,â he said. âWeâre there to help the Pakistanis, but weâre also there to extend our own axis of security to their nuclear stockpile.â The detailed American planning even includes an estimate of how many nuclear triggers could be placed inside a C-17 cargo plane, the former official said, and where the triggers could be sequestered.
âGeneralâ McChrystal got fired like a dog by Obama. Last assignment a total bust. Known for big, dumb mouth. Hillary lover!
US-Politik im News-Ticker – „Totale Pleite“: Trump schieĂt auf Twitter gegen Vier-Sterne-General
(heute)
The Secret US War in Pakistan
(23. November 2009) âI think Cheney and Rumsfeld went directly into JSOC. I think they went into JSOC at times, perhaps most frequently, without the SOCOM [Special Operations] commander at the time even knowing it. The receptivity in JSOC was quite good,â says Wilkerson. âI think Cheney was actually giving McChrystal instructions, and McChrystal was asking him for instructions.â He said the relationship between JSOC and Cheney and Rumsfeld âbuilt up initially because Rumsfeld didnât get the responsiveness. He didnât get the can-do kind of attitude out of the SOCOM commander, and so as Rumsfeld was wont to do, he cut him out and went straight to the horseâs mouth. At that point you had JSOC operating as an extension of the [administration] doing things the executive branchâread: Cheney and Rumsfeldâwanted it to do. This would be more or less carte blanche. You need to do it, do it. It was very alarming for me as a conventional soldier.â
C.I.A. Sought Blackwaterâs Help to Kill Jihadists
(19. August 2009) The C.I.A. this summer conducted an internal review of the assassination program that recently was presented to the White House and the Congressional intelligence committees. The officials said that the review stated that Mr. Panettaâs predecessors did not believe that they needed to tell Congress because the program was not far enough developed.
The House Intelligence Committee is investigating why lawmakers were never told about the program. According to current and former government officials, former Vice President Dick Cheney told C.I.A. officers in 2002 that the spy agency did not need to inform Congress because the agency already had legal authority to kill Qaeda leaders.
Cheney Is Linked to Concealment of C.I.A. Project
(11. Juli 2009) The Central Intelligence Agency withheld information about a secret counterterrorism program from Congress for eight years on direct orders from former Vice President Dick Cheney, the agencyâs director, Leon E. Panetta, has told the Senate and House intelligence committees, two people with direct knowledge of the matter said Saturday.
The report that Mr. Cheney was behind the decision to conceal the still-unidentified program from Congress deepened the mystery surrounding it, suggesting that the Bush administration had put a high priority on the program and its secrecy.
Seymour Hersh: Secret US Forces Carried Out Assassinations in a Dozen Countries, Including in Latin America
(31. MĂ€rz 2009) AMY GOODMAN: Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist Seymour Hersh created a stir last month when he said the Bush administration ran an executive assassination ring that reported directly to Vice President Dick Cheney. Hersh made the comment during a speech at the University of Minnesota on March 10th.
SEYMOUR HERSH: Congress has no oversight of it. Itâs an executive assassination wing, essentially. And itâs been going on and on and on. And just today in the Times there was a story saying that its leader, a three-star admiral named McRaven, ordered a stop to certain activities because there were so many collateral deaths. Itâs been going in â under President Bushâs authority, theyâve been going into countries, not talking to the ambassador or to the CIA station chief, and finding people on a list and executing them and leaving.
AMY GOODMAN: Yesterday, CNN interviewed Dick Cheneyâs former national security adviser, John Hannah. Wolf Blitzer asked Hannah about Sy Hershâs claim.
WOLF BLITZER: Is there a list of terrorists, suspected terrorists out there who can be assassinated?
JOHN HANNAH: There is clearly a group of people that go through a very extremely well-vetted process, inter-agency process, as I think was explained in your piece, that have committed acts of war against the United States, who are at war with the United States, or are suspected of planning operations of war against the United States, who authority is given to the troops in the field and in certain war theaters to capture or kill those individuals. That is certainly true.
WOLF BLITZER: And so, this would be, and from your perspective â and you worked in the Bush administration for many years â it would be totally constitutional, totally legal, to go out and find these guys and to whack âem.
JOHN HANNAH: Thereâs no question that in a theater of war, when we are at war, and we know â thereâs no doubt, we are still at war against al-Qaeda in Iraq, al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and on that Pakistani border, that our troops have the authority to go after and capture and kill the enemy, including the leadership of the enemy.
AMY GOODMAN: Thatâs John Hannah, Dick Cheneyâs former national security adviser. Seymour Hersh joins me now here in Washington, D.C., staff writer for The New Yorker magazine. His latest article appears in the current issue, called âSyria Calling: The Obama Administrationâs Chance to Engage in a Middle East Peace.â
……….
Reporter alleges secret ‚assassination wing‘
(30. MĂ€rz 2009) A Special Operations Command spokesman rejected Hersh‘s report, saying their forces operate under established rules of engagement and the law of armed conflict. He adds that the vice president has no command-and-control authorities over the U.S. military. Two former Cheney aides also reject the claim, as does the former Bush homeland security adviser, now a national security analyst. Hersh did not disclose any sources in the speech or in the CNN interview, nor was he asked about sources.
The assassination of political leaders has been banned since 1976 – but suspected terrorists are a different story.
Investigative reporter Seymour Hersh describes âexecutive assassination ringâ
(11. MĂ€rz 2009) âIn many cases, they were the best and the brightest. Really, no exaggerations. Really fine guys that went in to do the kind of necessary jobs that they think you need to do to protect America. And then they find themselves torturing people.
âIâve had people say to me â five years ago, I had one say: âWhat do you call it when you interrogate somebody and you leave them bleeding and they donât get any medical committee and two days later he dies. Is that murder? What happens if I get before a committee?â
âBut theyâre not gonna get before a committee.â
U.S. Halted Some Raids in Afghanistan
(9. MĂ€rz 2009) According to senior military officials, the stand-down was ordered by Vice Adm. William H. McRaven, the head of the militaryâs Joint Special Operations Command, which oversees the secret commando units.
The rising civilian death toll in Afghanistan has soured relations between American commanders and the Afghan government led by President Hamid Karzai, who has vocally criticized the raids.
The stand-down began in mid-February, and the raids have since resumed. It is unclear, though, whether the Special Operations missions are being carried out with the same frequency as before the halt.
Retired four-star Admiral William McRaven, the commander of U.S. Special Operations Command from 2011 to 2014 (which included the OBL mission), just issued the following statement to CNN in response to POTUS attacking GEN McChrystal on twitter:
Ret. admiral defends McChrystal on Trump claim
Ret. Admiral William McRaven came to the defense of Ret. General Stanley McChrystal after President Trump took shots at the general on Twitter following the comments McChrystal made on Trump during an ABC interview.
âgroĂes und dĂ€mliches Maulâ – Trump wettert gegen Vier-Sterne-General
(heute)
Die Hersh-Bombe
(3.Juli 2008) Nun ist aber innerhalb des US-MilitĂ€rs und in den Fluren von Washington bekannt geworden, dass ausser den CIA-gefĂŒhrten Einheiten auch hochgeheime Spezialkommandos des US-MilitĂ€rs vom „Joint Special Operations Command“ (JSOC) auf direkten Befehl von PrĂ€sident Bush und unter direkter Kontrolle von US-Vize Dick Cheney im Iran operieren.
Diese EinsÀtze wurden in den letzten Monaten massiv ausgeweitet und erfolgten ohne Wissen, Zustimmung oder Kooperation von Kongress, US-Zentralkommando CENTCOM und sogar US-Verteidigungsminister Robert Gates.
Hintergrund ist die Rechtsauffassung des Weissen Hauses, dass nur fĂŒr EinsĂ€tze der CIA das Parlament hinzugezogen werden muss, nicht aber fĂŒr EinsĂ€tze des MilitĂ€rs.
ErlÀuterung:
Dazu muss man die Struktur des US-MilitĂ€rs kennen. Die Befehlskette geht vom PrĂ€sidenten, dem VizeprĂ€sidenten, dem US-Verteidigungsminister im Pentagon ĂŒber die Kontinentalkommandos zu den Oberkommandierenden in den einzelnen LĂ€ndern, wie z.B. in Irak oder Afghanistan.
Der „Joint Chiefs of Staff“, der „Vereinigte Generalstab“ hat operativ nichts zu melden.
Die US-Kontinentalkommandos haben sich quasi als „Verantwortungsbereiche“ den Planeten aufgeteilt. NORTHCOM fĂŒr Nordamerika, SOUTHCOM fĂŒr SĂŒdamerika, CENTCOM fĂŒr den arabischen Raum mit den Kriegszonen Afghanistan und Irak, EUCOM fĂŒr Europa, Russland und Nordpolregion und das neue AFRICOM fĂŒr Afrika und PACOM fĂŒr China, Indien, die Antarktis und den gesamten Pazifik.
Neben den Kontinentalkommandos gibt es aber noch andere, weltweit tĂ€tige Kommandoabteilungen des Pentagon, fĂŒr strategische (also atomare) KriegfĂŒhrung sowie aus dem Weltraum (STRATCOM), fĂŒr Transport (TRANSCOM) und Versorgung (JFCOM).
Diese sind den Kontinentalkommandos gleichgestellt.
Ausserdem gibt es da noch das „U.S. Special Operations Command“ (SOCOM), dessen Einsatzgebiet nicht definiert ist und weltweit operiert. Ein klassischer Fall von oben organisierter KompetenzĂŒberschneidung im US-MilitĂ€r um RudelkĂ€mpfe hochzuhalten, Spannungen zu erzeugen und um Konkurrenzdruck zu erzeugen, was dann von der Hierarchie zu eigenen Zwecken umgemĂŒnzt werden kann.
Ein Unterkommando des SOCOM ist das „Joint Special Operations Command“ (JSOC), welches die Spezialeinheiten des Weissen Hauses fĂŒhrte um die es hier geht.
Bereits 2005 gab es Berichte ĂŒber ein geheimes Unterprogramm im JSOC namens „Power Geyser“. Darin sollen Spezialagenten in unmittelbarer Umgebung des US-PrĂ€sidenten, des VizeprĂ€sidenten und der FĂŒhrungsebene des Kongresses zu derem Schutz eingesetzt worden sein.
Also Agenten in unmittelbarer NÀhe und in unmittelbarer Kommunikation mit den mÀchtigsten offiziellen Amtspersonen der Welt. Eine ideale Voraussetzung um spÀter mit diesen Agenten die MilitÀrhierarchie zu umgehen.
Preparing the Battlefield
(Juli 2008) The covert operations set forth in the Finding essentially run parallel to those of a secret military task force, now operating in Iran, that is under the control of JSOC. Under the Bush Administrationâs interpretation of the law, clandestine military activities, unlike covert C.I.A. operations, do not need to be depicted in a Finding, because the President has a constitutional right to command combat forces in the field without congressional interference. But the borders between operations are not always clear: in Iran, C.I.A. agents and regional assets have the language skills and the local knowledge to make contacts for the JSOC operatives, and have been working with them to direct personnel, matĂ©riel, and money into Iran from an obscure base in western Afghanistan. As a result, Congress has been given only a partial view of how the money it authorized may be used. One of JSOCâs task-force missions, the pursuit of âhigh-value targets,â was not directly addressed in the Finding. There is a growing realization among some legislators that the Bush Administration, in recent years, has conflated what is an intelligence operation and what is a military one in order to avoid fully informing Congress about what it is doing.
Commandos See Duty on U.S. Soil In Role Redefined by Terror Fight
(23. Januar 2005) As part of the extraordinary army of 13,000 troops, police officers and federal agents marshaled to secure the inauguration, these elite forces were poised to act under a 1997 program that was updated and enhanced after the Sept. 11 attacks, but nonetheless departs from how the military has historically been used on American soil.
These commandos, operating under a secret counterterrorism program code-named Power Geyser, were mentioned publicly for the first time this week on a Web site for a new book, „Code Names: Deciphering U.S. Military Plans, Programs and Operation in the 9/11 World,“ (Steerforth Press). The book was written by William M. Arkin, a former intelligence analyst for the Army.
The precise number of these Special Operations forces in Washington this week is highly classified, but military officials say the number is very small. The special-missions units belong to the Joint Special Operations Command, a secretive command based at Fort Bragg, N.C., whose elements include the Army unit Delta Force.
Sunzi – Die Kunst des Krieges
Sunzi sagt: Die Kunst des Krieges ist fĂŒr den Staat von entscheidender Bedeutung. Sie ist eine Angelegenheit von Leben und Tod, eine StraĂe, die zur Sicherheit oder in den Untergang fĂŒhrt. Deshalb darf sie unter keinen UmstĂ€nden vernachlĂ€ssigt werden.
Die Kunst des Krieges wird von fĂŒnf konstanten Faktoren bestimmt, die alle berĂŒcksichtigt werden mĂŒssen. Es sind dies: das Gesetz der Moral; Himmel; Erde; der Befehlshaber; Methode und Disziplin.
(…)
Jede KriegfĂŒhrung grĂŒndet auf TĂ€uschung. Wenn wir also fĂ€hig sind anzugreifen, mĂŒssen wir unfĂ€hig erscheinen; wenn wir unsere StreitkrĂ€fte einsetzen, mĂŒssen wir inaktiv scheinen; wenn wir nahe sind, mĂŒssen wir den Feind glauben machen, daĂ wir weit entfernt sind; wenn
wir weit entfernt sind, mĂŒssen wir ihn glauben machen, daĂ wir nahe sind.
Lege Köder aus, um den Feind zu verfĂŒhren. TĂ€usche Unordnung vor und zerschmettere ihn. Wenn der Feind in allen Punkten sicher ist, dann sei auf ihn vorbereitet. Wenn er an KrĂ€ften ĂŒberlegen ist, dann weiche ihm aus. Wenn dein Gegner ein cholerisches Temperament hat,dann versuche ihn zu reizen.
Gib vor, schwach zu sein, damit er ĂŒberheblich wird. Wenn er sich sammeln will, dann lasse ihm keine Ruhe. Wenn seine StreitkrĂ€fte vereint sind, dann zersplittere sie. Greife ihn an, wo er unvorbereitet ist, tauche auf, wo du nicht erwartet wirst.
Der General, der eine Schlacht gewinnt, stellt vor dem Kampf im Geiste viele Berechnungen an. Der General, der verliert, stellt vorher kaum Berechnungen an. So fĂŒhren viele Berechnungen zum Sieg und wenig Berechnungen zur Niederlage â ĂŒberhaupt keine erst recht! Indem ich diesem Punkt Aufmerksamkeit widme, kann ich voraussagen, wer siegen oder unterliegen wird.
THE ART OF WAR BY SUN TZU
CHAPTER 1. LAYING PLANS
1. Sun Tzu said: The art of war is of vital importance to the State.
2. It is a matter of life and death, a road either to safety or to ruin. Hence it is a subject of inquiry which can on no account be neglected.
3. The art of war, then, is governed by five constant factors, to be taken into account in one‘s deliberations, when seeking to determine the conditions obtaining in the field.
4. These are: (1) The Moral Law; (2) Heaven; (3) Earth; (4) The Commander; (5) Method and discipline.
5,6. The MORAL LAW causes the people to be in complete accord with their ruler, so that they will follow him regardless of their lives, undismayed by any danger.
(…)
18. All warfare is based on deception.
19. Hence, when able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.
20. Hold out baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him.
21. If he is secure at all points, be prepared for him. If he is in superior strength, evade him.
22. If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant.
23. If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them.
24. Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected.
25. These military devices, leading to victory, must not be divulged beforehand.
26. Now the general who wins a battle makes many calculations in his temple ere the battle is fought. The general who loses a battle makes but few calculations beforehand. Thus do many calculations lead to victory, and few calculations to defeat: how much more no calculation at all! It is by attention to this point
that I can foresee who is likely to win or lose.
Retired Gen. Stanley McChrystal hits Trump as immoral, dishonest
(30.12.2018) Retired four-star Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal on Sunday criticized President Donald Trump for his approach to the presidency in a wide-ranging interview that saw the former top commander of the US and international forces in Afghanistan label Trump as dishonest and immoral.
„I don‘t think he tells the truth,“ McChrystal told ABC‘s Martha Raddatz on „This Week.“ When asked if he thought Trump was immoral, McChrystal responded: „I think he is.“
„Verlogen“: Ex-US-General kritisiert Trump heftig fĂŒr Syrien-Abzug
(31.12.2018) Nun hat sich auch Ex-General Stanley A. McChrystal kritisch zu Trumps PlĂ€nen geĂ€ussert. Der ehemalige Kommandant der US-StreitkrĂ€fte in Afghanistan bezeichnete Donald Trump und dessen Entscheidung als „unmoralisch und verlogen“.McChrystal hatte sich schon frĂŒher negativ ĂŒber den PrĂ€sidenten geĂ€ussert. Ex-Admiral William McRaven, der die Operation gegen den Terroristen Osama Bin Laden verantwortete, hatte Trump mehrfach öffentlich kritisiert. Trump nannte ihn darauf einen „Hillary-Clinton-Fan“ und „Barack-Obama-UnterstĂŒtzer“ und sagte, die Operation gegen Bin Laden habe viel zu lange gedauert. McChrystal nahm McRaven anschlieĂend in Schutz und stellte das Vertrauen in Trump infrage.
„Die Rote Hilfe ist gerade heute wertvoll“
Warum Bundestagsabgeordnete in den vom Verbot bedrohten Verein eintreten. Ein GesprÀch mit Kathrin Vogler
Brexit 2019: the Good, Bad and could-turn-Ugly options
Best case scenario: a No Deal Brexit
Weâd love a good exit deal, where the UK frees itself from the anti-democratic grip of the EU, regains its sovereignty, and retains close economic links with EU member states.
But there is no such deal on the table. The EU bureaucracy wants to punish the UK, to teach a lesson to upstart Leave voters who think democracy means the people taking control â and show other European proles what happens when they dare to defy their betters in Brussels.
Which means a No Deal, clean-break Brexit is the only available option which comes close to fulfilling the demand of 17.4million Leave voters. That makes it the Good option for 2019.