(05.05.2014) Inner City Press: there was a high-profile Freedom of Information Act response of documents by the US State Department about the Benghazi incidents, and although obviously that‘s something to be looked at by Congress, one of the documents released was an e-mail from Jeffrey Feltman at his UN e-mail address to Salman Ahmed, then an adviser to Susan Rice, saying „thank you for your note on the other system“. And I just wanted to know, because of the issues that came up because of the leak of the Victoria Nuland one, saying, „we‘ve spoken to Jeff,“ which seems clearly it was Jeff Feltman, I wanted to know, is there some other system by which, in this case a former US official, Jeffrey Feltman, communicates with the US Government?..
Deputy Spokesman Haq: Matthew, I don‘t see why I would analyse this precise wording of an email.
Inner City Press: You don‘t see the issue that it raises? Doesn‘t it ring a bell?
Deputy Spokesman: As far as I‘m aware, all these e-mails are being looked at by other authorities, and we‘ll let them do that.
Inner City Press: Right, but I‘m asking a UN question. They are not looking at it for the propriety of a UN official having another communication system with his or her own Government. That‘s not what they are looking at; I‘m asking you about that.
Deputy Spokesman: Jeffrey Feltman is an international civil servant working for the Secretary-General of the United Nations. There‘s never been any dispute about that and I don‘t believe that there‘s any conjecture even from the US Government people looking into these e-mails that there is such an issue raised by this e-mail that you‘re talking about. He‘s perfectly free to deal with US officials and people at the US Mission. He has to communicate with people from all the various missions, including, of course, the missions of our permanent Security Council members.
Inner City Press: Right, but in a separate system. That‘s what I‘m asking. I‘m specifically pointing at that word —
Deputy Spokesman: I think you‘re interpreting the wording in a way that may not necessarily be supported by what it means.
Inner City Press: What does it mean?
Deputy Spokesman Haq: I have no idea what it means.