Additional documents, obtained via public records requests, consist of communications among agents from the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. Justice Department, the Marshals Service, and the Bureau of Indian Affairs, as well as state and local police. The “Intel Group,” as its members refer to it, closely monitored anti-Dakota Access protests in real time, scooped up information on the water protectors from social media, and shared intelligence.

Elbit did not identify the country.

„Japan is also considering the purchase of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system. This will help create a multi-layered missile defense system consisting of Aegis, THAAD and Patriot PAC-3 networks to protect certain particularly valuable locations,“ according to Kashin.

Besides the candy bar farce which made Barghouti look foolish, there have been speculations in the Israeli media that elements in the PA have been working to derail the hunger strike in an effort to curb Barghouti’s rising clout as the aging Mahmoud Asbbas’s heir apparent.

(8.5.2017) The Israel Prison Service didn’t say how Barghouti obtained the food, but sources in the organization confirmed that they set him up in an attempt to see whether Barghouti was really sticking to the hunger strike.

(18.5.2017) A Jordanian – and not Israeli – agent is the source of the intelligence information leaked by U.S. President Donald Trump to the Russians last week, Al Jazeera reported early Thursday.

The report, which cites a number of Jordanian sources, contradicts claims that it was an Israeli spy within ISIS who had originally gained the information in question.

(16.5.2017) The life of a spy placed by Israel inside ISIS is at risk tonight, according to current and former U.S. officials, after President Donald Trump reportedly disclosed classified information in a meeting with Russian officials last week.

The spy provided intelligence involving an active ISIS plot to bring down a passenger jet en route to the United States, with a bomb hidden in a laptop that U.S. officials believe can get through airport screening machines undetected.

(11.8.1998) Der Ex-Geheimdienstler David Shayler, der jetzt mit der Geschichte über eine Verwicklung des SIS in einen Attentatsversuch auf den libyschen Diktator im Februar 1996 an die Öffentlichkeit getreten war, läßt schließlich offen, ob seine damaligen Kollegen die Londoner Regierung über das Vorhaben überhaupt informiert hatten. Ein Agent der Spionageabteilung MI6 mit dem Decknamen „PT16B“ soll Shayler im November 1995 berichtet haben, daß er über einen Verbindungsmann („Tunworth“) Kontakt zu einer fundamentalistischen Gruppe in Libyen aufgenommen habe, die einen Anschlag auf Gaddafi ausführen wolle. Als vier Monate später Berichte über ein mißlungenes Attentat im libyschen Sirte auf Shaylers Schreibtisch bei der Spionageabwehr MI5 landeten, habe sein MI6-Gegenüber „PT16B“ ihm „auf triumphierende Art gesagt, ja, wir haben es gemacht.“

(9.8.1998) Last week, history seemed to repeat itself when David Shayler, a former officer at the Libya desk of Britain‘s domestic security service, was arrested after threatening to disclose embarrassing agency secrets on the Internet. Newspapers that were poised to publish his allegations found themselves slapped with far-reaching injunctions in the name of national security.

Then, on Thursday, the newspaper The Guardian reprinted an article by The New York Times that described the British news media‘s inability to cover Mr. Shayler‘s story. It included details of Mr. Shayler‘s allegation that Britain‘s foreign intelligence service botched an assassination attempt against Muammar el-Qaddafi in 1996 — details subject to the injunction.

(12.6.2000) The third sort of manipulation is the most insidious – when intelligence agency propaganda stories are planted on willing journalists, who disguise their origin from their readers. There is – or has been until recently – a very active programme by the secret agencies to colour what appears in the British press, called, if publications by various defectors can be believed, information operations, or „I/Ops“. I am – unusually – in a position to provide some information about its operations.

Let us take the third allegation first. Black propaganda – false material where the source is disguised – has been a tool of British intelligence agencies since the days of the second world war, when the Special Operations Executive (SOE) got up to all kinds of tricks with clandestine radio stations, to drip pornography and pessimism into the ears of impressionable German soldiers.

At the heart of this story is Britain’s so-called domestic security and supposed intelligence service MI5, of which Mrs May was ultimately responsible for as Home Secretary and developed a very close working relationship with the spooks of Thames House, even employing some active members of MI5 as «Special Advisors» on her own staff, and coming closely under the influence of the so-called spooky «security experts» who work in and inhabit the shadows.

(10.9.2011) Am 22. August erschien eine Erklärung der NPA mit der Überschrift „Gaddafi ist gestürzt, jetzt kann das Volk entscheiden“. Dort wird erklärt: „Der Sturz des Diktators Gaddafi ist eine gute Nachricht für das Volk. Die NPA erklärt sich voll und ganz solidarisch mit dem anhaltenden revolutionären Prozess in der arabischen Region.“

Die Behauptung der NPA, die Vertreibung des Gaddafi-Regimes durch die imperialistische Intervention der Nato sei „eine gute Nachricht“, ganz zu schweigen davon, dass das „ein revolutionärer Prozess“ sei, ist eine reaktionäre politische Lüge.

(3.9.2011) Known in the jihadi world as Abu Abdullah al-Sadiq, Mr Belhaj is a former commander of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, which has been linked to al-Qaeda, the Taliban and the al-Jihad group in Egypt.

The LIFG staged three attempts to assassinate Colonel Gaddafi in 1995 and 1996 before it was disbanded in 1998. Mr Belhaj spent time in Abu Salim prison after being captured in Malaysia in 2004 and returned to Libya, after his second stint of fighting in Afghanistan after the September 11 attacks in the US.

(31.3.2011) Die Welt sieht sich mit einer sehr unberechenbaren und potentiell gefährlichen Situation in Nordafrika und im Mittleren Osten konfrontiert. Was mit den Revolutionen in Tunesien und Ägypten als eine bemerkenswerte, vielversprechende und verhältnismäßig gewaltfreie Errungenschaft der neuen Politik begann, ist sehr schnell in eine erneute Verschlimmerung alter Übel umgeschlagen: US-Amerika, das schon zwei Jahrzehnte lang in Kriegen im Irak und in Afghanistan feststeckt und dabei sporadisch immer mal wieder den Jemen und Somalia aus der Luft bombardiert, wirft seine Bomben nun auf ein weiteres Land der Dritten Welt ab, diesmal auf Libyen.