„George Orwell war harmlos dagegen. Ich habe den Eindruck, dass gerade ein paar Grundprinzipien freiheitlicher Gesellschaftsordnung mit Füßen getreten werden. Viele böse Dinge dieser Welt begannen im Namen der guten Absichten. Die gute Absicht heilt den Bruch eines Prinzips nicht. Was Wahrheit ist, definiert keine Regierung, auch nicht Facebook. Und was den Menschen zuzumuten ist, sollten nicht Zensurbehörden definieren. Der beste Garant für den mündigen Bürger ist die Vielfalt der Information, der Meinungen und Wahrheiten unterschiedlicher Verleger, TV- und Radiosender oder Online-Anbieter.“

On Saturday morning, President Donald Trump may have unleashed his most bone-chilling tweet — at least to those who believe the United States should not become a Trump-led dictatorship. And I don‘t make that comment simply to be provocative or without giving it a great deal of thought. Our democracy is far more fragile than some might grasp and Trump is engaging in a concerted effort to undermine the workings of it.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Bahram Qasemi was quoted by Tasnim news agency as saying: „Iran‘s missile test was not a message to the new U.S. government.

„There is no need to test Mr Trump as we have heard his views on different issues in recent days… We know him quite well.“

If the vote takes place, the majority of our lawmakers will raise their hands to approve a bill that will steal land from Palestinians.

(…)

Er sei besorgt…

At the start of their meeting, Netanyahu calls for more sanctions on Iran, which ‚seeks to annihilate Israel and to conquer the Middle East.‘

Putin‘s spokesman also demands an apology from Fox News for ‚unacceptable‘ reference to the Russian leader as ‚a killer‘ during an interview with the U.S. president.

United States President Donald Trump travels to the US Central Command (Centcom) on Monday (Feb 6), meeting officers who will form the tip of the spear in implementing his new strategy to defeat the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) group.

The Kremlin said on Monday it wanted an apology from Fox News over what it said were „unacceptable“ comments one of the channel‘s presenters made about Russian President Vladimir Putin in an interview with U.S. counterpart Donald Trump.

Fox News host Bill O‘Reilly described Putin as „a killer“ in the interview with Trump as he tried to press the U.S. president to explain more fully why he respected his Russian counterpart. O‘Reilly did not say who he thought Putin had killed.

The brief obtained by NBC News was written jointly by four former heads of the CIA, two former Secretaries of State, a former Secretary of Defense, a former Secretary of Homeland Security, and senior officials of the National Security Council.

Bei Twitter schrieb er: „Ich kann es einfach nicht glauben, dass ein Richter unser Land einer solchen Gefahr aussetzt. Wenn etwas passiert, gebt ihm und dem Gerichtswesen die Schuld. Menschen strömen herein. Schlecht!“ Adressat der Schuldzuweisung ist Bundesrichter James Robart in Seattle, der das Einreiseverbot für Menschen aus sieben mehrheitlich muslimischen Länder am Freitag vorläufig aufgehoben hatte.

In 2016 alone, U.S. combat aircraft conducted at least 456 airstrikes in Afghanistan that were not recorded as part of an open-source database maintained by the U.S. Air Force, information relied on by Congress, American allies, military analysts, academic researchers, the media and independent watchdog groups to assess each war‘s expense, manpower requirements and human toll. Those airstrikes were carried out by attack helicopters and armed drones operated by the U.S. Army, metrics quietly excluded from otherwise comprehensive monthly summaries, published online for years, detailing American military activity in all three theaters.

Most alarming is the prospect this data has been incomplete since the war on terrorism began in October 2001.

The Equal Protection Clause bars all federal officials, including the President, from treating individuals differently because of their national origin. The Order violates these basic precepts. It bars anyone from seven countries from immigrating to the United States for a period of 90 days, and provides that the President may indefinitely bar immigration from other countries, as well. Order § 3(c), (e)-(f). The Order thus does exactly what section 1152(a)(1)(A) and the Constitution prohibit: it discriminates against immigrants on the basis of nationali-ty. See Olsen v. Albright, 990 F. Supp. 31, 39 (D.D.C. 1997) (“The principle that government must not discriminate against particular individuals because of the color of their skin or the place of their birth means that the use of generalizations based on these factors [in the immigration context] is unfair and unjustified.”).