Take, for example, this „fake news“ story that got a lot of attention when it came out right around Thanksgiving: the Washington Post claimed that some „experts“ had shown that Russian propagandists were behind the fake news explosion during the election. Which experts? The story doesn‘t say. What evidence? The story doesn‘t say. The article is focused on a brand new organization called „PropOrNot“ that claimed to be run by experts, but won‘t identify who‘s involved, and the Washington Post didn‘t seem to care. But still it made incredibly broad claims about „fake news“ and Russian propaganda.